The Existence Of God Essay -- essays research papers

The Existence of idolThe founding of a divinity fudge has for generations been the topic of fiercedebate. This most usu each(prenominal)y occurring between members of the religious confederacyand, everybody else. As a matter of fact the religious world itself has nonal ways been able to agree on deity. This has resulted in many a holy man to takeup the fight for his deity finished the realm of words. Many theories pass water beenproposed, and all think that theirs proves beyond a doubt on whether or not Godexists. To write this idea I read four of those theories by assorted men ofthe cloth, who all attempt to make the argument for a God in the Christian sense.The first of the theories I looked at was that of St.Anslem ofCanterbury. He supplies the ontological argument for the existence of God. Theontological argument states that by understanding the nature of God himself, we adopt to realize he exists. He explains this argument by first shaping what Godis. Anslem says that G od is a being than which nothing greater heap be conceivedto exist, that it bottomland not even be considered not to exist. In short, the factthat said being can not be considered not to exist, would thereby make itgreater than any that could be considered not to exist. This would in allreality be the secret to Gods omnipotence in Anlsems eyes. Another mastermind thathe stresses is that just be understanding the concept of what a God is, you areproving his existence. This is because if you understand who God is, you canalso accept his existence, and indeed cannot conceive that he does not exist.Therefore making him that which nothing greater can be conceived of, and whichcannot be conceived not to exist which we absorb already defined as God.The second argument for a God comes from St. Tomas Aquinas, who arguesfor the cosmological point of view. The cosmological argument states that allthings in this universe have a cause, and since these causes cannot go on forever there must iness be a first cause, i.e. God. He argues that there are five waysto argue for the existence of God, the first is the argument from motion. Thisstates that everything in this world has veritable potentials for motion. It alsostates that for these potentials to be met another object n motion must set offsaid potential. That object in turn would have ... ...ad and the point would be moot.So by looking at these paths public address system decided to look at the risks of eachwager. In the first you narrow infinite rewards from only one life of believing.Plus he matt-up that you also probably had a fulfilling and enjoyable life too. Sothe first, can be looked at as a win win berth in which you risked verylittle, and won much. The second and fourth possibilities did not in realityconcern pappa much because by thinking of it in footing of odds, neither seemedprobable, and again wouldnt matter anyhow because you would no longer exist.The third possibility however, in which you cou ld end up in hell, seemed to help transmit Pascal into believing in a God. He felt that for the substance you had tolose in this situation, no intelligent human would take the risk. So inconclusion, Pascal came to believe that believing in a God was a safe bet, inthat it had the least risk with the highest returns.As for myself, later reading these papers I find myself tending to sidewith Pascal the most. I dont think that a little insurance could hurt, becauseuntil there is certainty otherwise none of us really know.