Does the Media Promote Terrorism?

Assignment Some scholars argue that too often the media helps further terrorists agenda. Others, however, disagree. What is your own position on the medias role and impact in diligence terrorist cases? Organize your reply by selecting three case stu survives that, by employing the corresponding assumption or hypothesis, appear to compose a pattern that supports your opinion. Your tell should non exceed five hundred words (about two double-spaced, typed pages). Does the Media labor Terrorism? The news media of Ameri washbasin society does not encourage terrorism. The more over thing that the media encourages is knowledge of what is going on around the world.Unfortunately, some terrorist organizations rehearse the news media to gain recognition for their groups causes and goals. Most of the time, the media will serve as force to gain citizen support for the governments actions against a terrorist movement. The only problem with having the license of press that the united Stat es enjoys is that everyone has a voice. When it comes down to an American putting to death an American, the media is not entirelyied with the terrorist. Americans do not like to see fellow citizens die at the hands of a terrorist, especially by an American terrorist. herds grass McVeigh, probably unknowingly, helped in decreasing the function of American terrorist. McVeighs act, bombing the Murrah building in Oklahoma City, was seen as so repulsive that many law-abiding volume attracted to reservess simply walked away. The majority of Americans didnt want to be associated with anything like the killing of 168 Americans, even though McVeigh had only attended a few militia meetings. (Mahan & Griset, p. 225) The media coverage for the bombing in 1995 gave the American public the education essential to assess what was going on in the militant organizations across the United States.No one truly believes that the media plan or suggest terrorist attacks to groups or individuals. But the action of the media has been scrutinized intensely in recent years to desexualize whether media coverage of terrorist events caused terrorists to choose one particular choice of action over another. (Combs, p. 179) The education of American citizens is an invaluable tool that is channeled through the media for the benefit of all citizens. With the help of the media, the people get all of the facts and ar able to design their own opinion about what is going on, who is responsible for events, and how future events can be avoided.The media and the government take aim common interests in seeing that the media are not manipulated into promoting the cause of terrorism or its methods On the other hand, uncomplete the media or policymakers want to see terrorism, or counter terrorism, eroding constitutional freedoms including that of the pressone of the pillars of democratic societies. (Perl) In conclusion if terrorists seek media state of wariness and are given after an attack, their act will be seen as successful so, by not overruling other real news media, have the ability to affect the scale of an attack.With todays worldwide meshwork accessibility to anyone at anytime the support and especially funding of terrorism acts whitethorn increase. But, however, the CNN affect in other words may increase the number of casualties from a terrorist attack if international press exaggerating the hatred towards terrorism and war on terror. Out of this it is clear that media as the voice of the people encourages the scale of the terrorist attack but not the actual terrorist attack in itself.ReferencesCombs, C. (2010). Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century ( 6th Ed.), Charlotte, NC. PearsonMahan, S. & Griset, P. (2008). Terrorism in Perspective ( 2nd Ed.), Thousand Oaks, California Sage Publications.Perl, R. (1997). Terrorism, The Media, and the Government Perspectives, Trends, and Options for Policymakers Retrieved Febraury 25, 2011 from http//www.fas.org/irp/crs/c rs-terror.htm.