четверг, 13 декабря 2018 г.

'Is the World Flat?\r'

' orbicularization is a big issue in our modern day. What is globalisation? Has globalisation passed its peak? Is the man like a shot or spiky? There atomic number 18 s everal rattling vocal proponents of an argument that the realism has become insipid tire in recent years. However, there be or so writers have the inverse vox populi. This paper introduces both sides of the knock over and presents the arguments for and against the idea that the orb has become flat in recent years. The term â€Å"globalization” today refers to the hawk in the earthly concern economy. It is moving towards a more(prenominal) integrated and interdependent macrocosm economy (H. C. W, p. 8).\r\nglobalization makes people, countries and markets closer. The origination is flat; this view is supported by most people, moreover the most prominent beingness Thomas L. Friedman. â€Å"It’s a Flat cosmea, after All” is a journal by Friedman which was publish in 2005. In this article, Friedman argues the public is â€Å"flat” as a result of globalization; it is also a product of a convergence of personal estimator and fiber-optic micro cable and software. sphericalization has leveled the performing fields between different countries. This is what he called Globalization 3. 0 (started some 2000) which quite different from the in the beginning 2. 0 and 1. 0 versions (Thomas L.\r\nFriedman, 2005). To support the â€Å"flat world”, Friedman identities ten flattening factors that he sees as leveling the global playing field. Thomas Friedman taught us that the world is flat, but is the world really flat? Richard Florida has scorned his arguments. Florida, says that the world is actually spiky. In â€Å"The humankind is Spiky”, published in The Atlantic Monthly in 2005, Florida argues that frugal power, innovation, and creative talent is actually only clump in a few cities and regions, so these areas are growing higher while ot her areas suffer (Richard Florida, 2005) Florida uses a series of maps to prove his argument.\r\nHe shows where the world’s population centres are and where many of the world’s patents are issued and where the most scientists are located. Florida mentions the voice of the world’s population living in urban areas is over 50% world round-eyed now compared to just 3% in 1800. virtually big cities, such as New York, Los Angeles, Toronto, Vancouver, Tokyo, Shanghai, around the globe are towers of patent filings, population, and science, but some cities are not. So the ability to innovate and compel is only centred among few places in the world (Richard Florida, 2005).\r\nPankaj Ghemawat, is another(prenominal) writer scorns the argument for the world has become flat. He argued more than ninety percent of the worlds phone calls, tissue traffic, and investments are still domestic (Ghemawat, 2007). Ghemawat also suggests that Friedman’s assertions are exagg erated visions. He points out that Friedman has grossly exaggerated the signifi dissolvece of the trends he describes: â€Å"Despite slop of a new, wired world where information, ideas, money, and people can move around the planet faster than ever before, just a fraction of what we consider globalization actually exists (Ghemawat, 2007)\r\nThe issue of if the world has become flat in recent years has divided opinion in two different sides. Proponents of an argument that the world has become flat, like Friedman, believes people are acquire closer and all competitors have an equal opportunity. The opposite side, such as Florida and Ghemawat, says otherwise. They think there are peaks and valleys. The peaks are getting stronger and more connected to from each one other. Word Count: 613 words Bibliography Article Florida, R. 2005, ‘The world is spiky, Atlantic Monthly (October), pp. 8-51. Friedman, T. L. 2005, ‘It’s a flat world, after all, The New York Times Maga zine, April 3, pp. 33-37. Ghemawat, P. 2007, ‘Why the world isnt flat, Foreign Policy (March-April), pp. 54-60. Hill, C and Cronk, T and Wickramasekera, R. ‘Global Business Today’, pp. 8 Internet ‘The World is Not Flat †Its Spiky’, February 26, 2006, from: http://remoteaccess. typepad. com/remote_access/2006/02/the_world_is_no. html ‘Is the World Flat … or Spiky? ’ From: http://insidework. net/resources/articles/is-world-flat-or-spiky\r\n'

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий