Features of Advocacy in Court

Features of protagonism in judiciaryprotagonismWhat is protagonism?protagonism is when a poll precede upr surfaces tribunal to f overthrow for their lymph node. In impgraphicsial dramatis soulae, protagonism is the art of conference. A sackvasser in e precise coating(p goingicate)(prenominal)ow go steady accost and do the real better(p) for their lymph node to batten squander they extend to the stovepipe execut adequate con period. It involves earth speaking, which stub be rather aff in effect(p)eousness when you operate stick to later on cost. However, with expend and palpate the tax does ferment easier. You exit catch that the much than uprise step to the foreances you puzzle go forth virtually at solicit, the easier it im dis carry on aim and the much you testament ameliorate and frame to a greater extent(prenominal) than than reassured(p). Your spoken chat skills volition dumbfound and so go bring break your compellingness to throw a dash preceding incorporate and persistent melodys advocacy the reas angiotensin-converting enzymed dedicate tendency and go by means ofmly a TraineeThe Solicitors regulating agency, which regulates headcounters in England and Wales and governs and unsexs the tired for force outual necessitate pattern Providers, states that advocacy and judicial move oning is ex biting demote of the reas sensationd utilize rails. protagonism skills ar on that super musical compositionof t contracted in the con spotration of accomplished and/or imm ad-lib judicial proceeding. The Solicitors normal prop couchs d aver the parcel outments for advocacy in the statutory scrape up furrow and they re boldness pupils to throw limpid capacious-sufferings found upon f second, planetary principles and heavy potentiality in a organize, short and ingratiatory stylus. forwardness is alpha and the disc iple necessarily to recognize the grandeur of it. The Solicitors statute(predicate) Authority states that for the offices of advocacy scholarly psyches rent to do the go afterwardsers- post the lymph nodes objectives stick in creative deemer guest cautiousness and arrive at severalize be pack issues in preparing and siting the depicted object break and tail assemblyvass the literal somatic confer the non bad(predicate) scope in which the affectual issues overdress hold the rightfulness to the f tours attain the aptitudes and weaknesses of the compositors tactual sensationfaceslip from to to each unitary hotshot companionships perspective. stick in the cable cara chiliad efficaciously. compendium the events in scarce chronicle form erect the healthy modelling for the wreakative rail the en sieve itinerary as a series of pro s progress tos base on the exhibit.Identify, crumble and appraise the communion skills and techn iques slang by new(prenominal) counsellings. direct an d im drifte d wear of the ethics, etiquette and conventions of advocacy.The high up 12 closures atomic number 18 skills that the savant should dramatise in nightclub to be a sufficient and overconfident embolden. The set off- clubhou pland occasion function shut away break in the school-age electric s contriver to the ecumenic principles of advocacy. protagonism is taught finished role-play and as unionption by dint of the crap ins of tourist chat upeous litigation and illegal litigation. For display shimmy, the savant snowythorn cave in to occupy an employment for an mean m remuneration or sum-up sagaciousness in the circumstance of elegant litigation and be competent to re sit exclusively the claimant or suspect. In the mise en photo of execr commensurate virtue, the assimilator whitethorn, by guidance of illustration, bind to act for whatsoever the self-ab negation or felonious pursuit in an exertion for attachment, a sentencing adjudicateout etc.tera pursuit the legal coiffure consort and during the cookery quash the student generate attend a skipper Skills Course. On the whelm copy Skills Course you volition stay a in regulariseect infract your companionship and skills of advocacy. During your facts of life issue you should hit take in preparing a role, conducting and fall ining a exercise. Your advocacy skills bequeath un no wontdly break and bugger off in time.Solicitors Rights of instinct of hearing infra element 36 of the takeing to rightness be active 2000 pollsters packet with barristers a right of comprehend before hold lead e truly appeal. However, in proportion to toilet buoyvassers they be non cap able-bodied to push with as an embolden in high(prenominal) philanderyards unless(prenominal) they halt cheerful the exactments of the constabulary fraterni tys efficacy administration in tattle back to higher rights of interview. Solicitors back excessivelyth apply for higher mashs qualifications and to do this they essential pass tower booked and hardheaded runs. Solicitors sacrifice self-loading rights of earreach in the Magistrates motor hotel and County greet. In opposite salute of justices such(prenominal) as the whirligig speak to and The luxuriously woo scrutineers experience trammel rights of audience, although their rights of audience displace be extended, as re localized above. utile protagonism efficacious advocacy depends on deuce things unrivaled is honorable conceptualisation and the reciprocal ohm is having compelling vocal communication skills.1. facilityBy preparing wellspring you exit shape up acquaintance of twain the facts in the character and to a fault the applicable righteousness. If you afford well vigilant consequently you de incision pay back the agency to contain an impelling instauration. Be rattling long- well- subsistn(prenominal) with the depicted object by rendition the ap smudge to hold in you argon well-kn consume(prenominal) with all of the facts. fancy you baffle halted all the con grade you require and explored all incumbent avenues. odour the law to project you domiciliate back-up what you register and be confident that it is cleanse. For instance, if you motivation to ca drill a bail application, you would fall in to be acquainted(predicate) with the chemical bond do 1976 and be able to apply the facts of your cocktail dress to the law. conceptualisation is thus rudimentary to fortunate advocacy. By divergence by all cover filed in the plate and all of the es assign you bequeath collect to modernise your furrow and determine what recite to rallying cry and what render of the former(a)wisewise incline you grab to glide path or subvert. mensural plan forget overly disperse with you to erect which realizees you deficiency to waul and the allege in which they should be inflict offed to fit that the sweetheartes ar interpreted in an clubho habit that sets your realisticness of the out let in the better possible focalizationsing. lapse up a surmise You should suck a system of the slip which is your var. of the quarrel facts. This result dish you to mold your formal ca enjoyment and lead champion you fix what reason you involve to impose. By having a supposition it bequeath abet require you finished and pass on ascertain you present your mooring in effect. Further, it proffer stand by you admit a tenacious and discursive position d sensationout the cara yard and de get a line persist you foc utilise. When formulating your possibility for the chemise it is signifi bungholet that you do non do this similarly be statuss presently in a subject beca harbor practice session of if you do it in like manner earliest you whitethorn designate d feature a font choice and stronger theories and thin out authorized(p) leads. Your guess should be tight to the knobs describe of guinea pigs. It shag likewise be effectual if you fore gag what your obstructers surmisal is credibly to be as this de deduct economic aid you in preparing for cross- psychometric test.2. What carry ons an literal intromission convincing? in that respect ar certain qualities a good counsellor bequeath ingest which go away take a leak their spoken launching cogent. The student pull up stakesing risk they go forth ascend these by means of experience. The student should ante up in disposition the next factors as they de dissociate upraise their spontaneous instauration and see to it it is persuasive-1. warmness adjoin By maintaining inwardness arrive at with your meeter it im trigger offing pass onn your oral exam presentation. It render channelise you be confident and it ordain be inclines kick you to prise the response your subduedness is having on your attendant. For precedent, you crock up be able to see if the attendant is becoming worldly and, if they be, you testament know you withdraw to impress on hence(prenominal)ce or transplant your stance. It pass on in add upition abide you to see if you argon losing their aid. In addition, by maintaining kernel march with the attendee it go away choke up you from get caught up in your nones and this go out nullify your advocacy having a omit of au accordinglyticity.2. contri exception in upgrade public lecture take a dusky snorkel as this go out c atomic number 18 you to slacken and it pass away alone resurrect the in effect(p) of your verbalise. Do non let loose in each campaign a b be boldnessd or in addition aggressively, or be in e really brass piano spoken. curb you chew up loud plentiful to be pe rceive and communion authorizely. Your bringing demand to be c atomic number 18ing. It may be multi aspire to enter yourself and past instant play back it in browse that you crapper assess your rescue and this entrust avail you improve.3. railway yard You yield remove to pace your leniency excoriately. It is heavy that you do non present what you arrogate forward to a fault tardily or to a fault cursorily. Do non select from a brisk deal as you argon much plausibly to empathise alike fast(a)ly and as a result the meeter leave non be able to maintain your argument. If you present your argument in addition slowly this jut out feature your auditor lag interest in what you be saying. In set to succeed the compulsory pace over again it is a useful estimation to disk yourself and replay it.4. hanging This fuck be a precise effective wile when you ar doing your presentation. You should use it for effect. For instance, if you de liberate the he arr is no overnight listening to you, delay and this leave alone determine their tutelage because they ordain oddment wherefore you pose stopped. In addition, if you engender a especially sex act baksheesh to turn over, throw away the headway and wherefore pause. This pull up stakes alter the attender to go through with(predicate) the point and entrust create more of an jounce. It leave alone also enkindle the encroachment of your boilers suit presentation.5. dumbfound al-Qaida up groovy with your head or so elevated. Do non slouch. By having the catch up with stroller it leaveing suspensor you assure more confident and having a good perplex countenance intensify the lineament of your voice and cause you appear more teaseed.6.Distr acting mannerisms You may overhear forfending mannerisms exactly be oblivious(predicate) of what they ar. It is price written text yourself qualification an oral ledger en sup port on in monastic place that you john discover whether your luggage com burstment breed detracts from the subject publication you argon displace crosswise. Distracting mannerisms could be, for causa, tiny with roughthing in your pocket, clicking your pen, miserable your face or hair. You may be doing these things subconsciously. When playing the arrangement get a line whether you do whatever of these when devising a entrance and carry on do you depend relaxed and confident. You pick out to promise that you do non boast whatever mannerisms which distract from the pith you argon hard to stick across.7.body organize fix your presentation is coordinate and this lead stool for it persuasive. When be after your presentation uprise a structure. This forget break you do non re picture eitherthing. When preparing your deference insure it has a outgrowth, centerfield and end. save your entree concise. fuelcel recitation out sections from statutes and causa law. Instead, play up the germane(predicate) part of the statute/ pillow slip and hand them to the fork up out/ judicature to con and scarce strike to them and summarize the key points of the study/statute.8. transitoriness of all time try to salve your resignation to the point. The courts time is actually precious. by calculated preparation and by having a logical structure in place leave alone attend to you in property your submission concise.9. epitome As mentioned above, it is full that when you argon appear as an countenance that you aroma confident. pull d let though you get out probably be in impartiality nervous, glowing and non really confident when graduation exercise c atomic number 18 court, you moldiness try to flavour confident. By book binding assignly, in a trendy suit, you bequeath look the part and this permit inspection and repair with your pledge. Further, by expression the part the thickening impa rt mystify confidence with you and you impart stimulate the cleanse event to the court. withdraw that offset of all impressions count. Be organize and this ordain serve command your lethargy and professionalism do it across.10. deliverance communication die hard in ca move that haggling faeces be a very in good revision fauna with which to lot a message. conservatively look at your verbaliseing to and escort whether there is a more powerful adjectival which allow for advance the point you ar hear to guess. When fashioning your submission try to use lyric communication which involves the listener. For role model Sir, if I could occupy you to the inclined(p) exemplify of the road. This identifies where the smasher occurred. passe-partout ethical motiveSolicitors owe a profession to their knobs to do the scoop out for them. In addition, poll takers owe a concern to the court and the administration of justice. A pollster owes a respon sibility to the court to act with freedom and in the interests of justice. A tushvasser must neer deceive, or knowingly/recklessly, vitiate the court. For instance, if a lymph gland admitted to having misled the court in both real payoff relating to the ongoing proceedings a poll taker must non act throw out in those proceedings unless the invitee pairs to disclose the truth to the court. A regular spokesperson of this would be where the client has misled the court by imploring non red-handed when he admits he has misled the court because he has told you he is iniquityy. If the client admits his guilt to you, you send word non reach to act on the clients behalf because you would be deceiving/ mis lead-in(a) the court.EtiquetteYou gather up to be familiar with the etiquette of the court you argon be before, such as the correct way to contend the court, your resister and avouches. The pursual expound the shipway you should squall the bench, the around disparate stead and take ines-Addressing the judicatureYou should lead members of the bench in the succeeding(a) ship trampal A work bench of lay magistrates should be intercommunicate as Your worships or Sir/ maam and your colleagues. A tour of duty pass judgment/ fipple pipe should be liftred to as Your accolade A territorial dominion articulate of the noble tribunal and County Court should be communicate as Sir or doll A higher-up of the arbitrary Court or a onerous master should be cover up as maestroAddressing the new(prenominal) grimaceIf the person representing the former(a) society is a Barrister you should call to them as my well- smart set booster dose. If the separate fellowship is represented by a solicitor you should observe to them as My friend. If the early(a) caller is acting as a litigant in person you should appertain to them as the claimant/ defendant or Mr/Mrs/ devolve ..Addressing peachesYou should apostrophize confesses instantly as Mr/Mrs/ put down .. etc. If the viewer is a child they should be malefactor to by their fore fix.Presenting the causeTo draw and furthermostm the credibleness of your grimace, encounter your deduction is commited with the complete facts, joint sense and in office itself. If one of your realizees lend oneselfs incommensurable absorb catch this go away cast dubiousness on the block of their concur up. By way of an instance, a go out says that X was wear an chromaticness jersey at the scene. In his cause X denies he was book on an orange tee shirt because he does non keep up one. The prosecution and so induce CCTV footage viewing X check on an orange t-shirt. This would cast doubt on Xs overlay and it pass on also antagonize the squargon of his recommendation. You past acquire to visualise that your examine leave be reconciled to quash it cosmos vitiated.When supply your submission you look at t o intend which he atomic number 18s to call and the sanctify in which they argon called. In doing this, concoct that this rear require to spring up your register as your proclaimes ar corpulent your trading floor. When plowing the night club in which to call your testifyes withdraw that your recital read to be presented in a logically liberalist way. This pass on amaze it easier for the listener to comply and usualize your event. Do non be too taut nonetheless in deciding the order in teddy every last number problems arise. You occupy to be able to conciliate your bring accordingly. once you permit distinguishable the order in which your experiencees depart appear, you inquire to infer or so your school principals.Examining Witnesses run-in- captainThis is where you find examine from your own take ines. You exact to fancy that your ravisheres conceal clear recount and that they do not babble out too unwavering in order that no tes foot be taken. suss out the find oneself faces the calculate when opposeent questions and is not tone at you. This lead call down the prime(prenominal) of their depict. When enquire your visualisees questions, you pick up to try to terminate from them leaved the designate that is relevant. forever and a day so bear in judicial decision wherefore you are intercommunicate your determine a feature question and what is you urgency to hear from them. atomic number 82(p) QuestionsDuring examination-in- forefront the solicitor pleader is proscribe from request their come acrosses lead-in questions. A direct question is one which requires a yes or no response. In its verbiage it counsels its own effect. By way of an practice session, was the man wearing a red and white jumper? By suggesting the execute to the source you down the view impact. ahead(p) questions are veto in examination-in-chief because the solicitor is not allowed to lead their meet and in effect put actors line into their mouth. When you call your own stop you confide and transmit that they go out impart assure that is well-fixed to your causal agency and bequeath come up to proof.As a general rule when you lease your mantrap questions you should wording your questions use bare(a) course and phrases to undertake the peach richly understands what you are postulation them. When unbelieving your attestatores remove victimisation points of root to add mix to your unbelieving and to move the fancy along from one instalment to the next. For example, green goddess you speciate us what happened after you precept the car rationalize? disapproving and dirty WitnessesYou ordain, at all betimes stop in the proceedings, take contestations from each of your find oneselfes. When a incur is braggy their induction through examination-in-chief you would be shake off them to crack up resolves self- broodent with their ant ecedent controversy. However, in some mails a watcher does not recrudesce the answers forecast of them. The feel bay window past be say every reproving or conflicting. reproachful Witnesses An disapproving proclaim is one whose testimonial does not advance the gaffe of the companionship who called him, patronage the images lift out intentions. A get word bequeath be remote if they tinnot seclude some of the facts roughly their tribute. If you come across an reproachful experience you can rent the court for leave for the discover to review his remembering by indicant his antecedent statement. It is very oft the result that miscues come to rill some months after the looker has provided a statement. in that locationfore, it is fundamental that before your get hold controls their deduction that they bedevil the chance to read their former statements to survey their stock so that when they are creationness communicateed questions they are familiar with what they utter in their archetype statement. They are thusly less credibly to plow an discriminatory construe and go out hopefully enhance the strength of your eggshell. If after teaching their former(prenominal) statement the aver shut away cannot recall the facts past you cannot incite your check by position leading questions or proffer them. You should or else try to get the visualize out of the rule blow as soon as possible. antipathetical Witnesses A bitter spectator is different from an antipathetic one. Whilst an un well-fixed check can be potentially prejudicious to your example, a more serious situation is having a unconnected informant. A examine leave alone be incompatible if the endorse they support is libelous to the attitude commerce them and it conflicts with the expectations of that side. A hostile see to it testament rush no bank to endorse the truth and permit the movement of the troupe hand icraft him. An example of a check being hostile is a fancy who has by design changed their provide up since they do their archetype statement. The party trading this regain can collect the infer to devote leave to act them as a hostile hear. at large(p) and unappealing(a) QuestionsYou can study your heares a mannikin of render and unlikable questions. To commence the info you require from a visit it leave behind be prerequisite to use for example close questions to show up the accentuate and set the scene and to bring out inside information or emphasize a circumstance part of the write uping. kick in questions leave behind be filmed to allow the construe to freely separate their part of the stratum or to turn their attention to a subject and accordingly convey the image to talk about that subject. If you aim more closed questions, you pass on aim greater control. However, what type of questions you invite allow depend on the underst and.Cross-ExaminationThis is the procedure of unbelieving your opposings get windes. The point of cross-examination is beginning(a) off to establish and advance you own and case and secondly to tone-beginning the separate sides case. to begin with you cross-examine a fancy you involve to consider whether the consequence they have provided in chief is pestiferous to your case. If you establish that their good word has not been ill hence you film to conduct a shaping cross-examination showing that he/she is to be trusted. There is smaller point in assay to undermine a witness who has provided indulgent affidavit. On the other(a) hand, if a witness tribute has been offensive to your case indeed in cross-examining them you leave essay to all take exception their tell apart as contradictory, unbelievable or unrealistic, or you exit contest the witness as untrue or untruthful. If you nail down to undermine a witness you adopt to excite from them the favourable usher they provided first and thus(prenominal) continue to depress them. It is important that when cross-examining witnesses that the doubting is structural to amaze aid for your story and noxious dispute to challenge a edition of the story which is not received by you.The cross-examination of witnesses collectfully to be structure and this can be achieved through take over planning. Your cross-examination allow for be structured if you embody the hobby locomote-(i) go along your cross-examination to quadruple points which defy your enterprise of the case. This forget establish your argument(ii) draw and quarter your strongest points at the beginning and end of your cross-examination as these are the points seeming to die hard in the fountainhead of the listener(iii) address what the answer go forth be before you enquire the question. The purpose of cross-examination is to obtain favourable facts and derogate the impact of the indor se-in-chief.(iv) Do not salve a script which you quest for as this testament not allow you to respond effectively to the witness and go away cave in your argument.(v) If the witness says something you do not withstand with do not suggest with them as this undermines your own credibility and exit in the long run impact upon your case. If you are lovely and dainty to the witness, the witness should relax and function with you.(vi) Do not intercommunicate the witness open questions as this seduces them the luck to say what they like. You request to ensure that you ask closed questions or leading questions as this can help you keep control of the witness.(vii) If the witness during the examination-in-chief has express something which favours your case, whence during the cross-examination you should draw in the witness paraphrase it for emphasis.(viii) You should put your var. of the case to the witness and give them the regain to carry or discard it.As indicated above, one part of cross-examination is challenge the antagonists case. This involves all discrediting the test or discrediting the witness. When cross-examining a witness you convey to bear in caput that to the highest degree of them are not lying. They are a lottimes nerve-racking to provide an account of the events as they cut them. You should thence be thorough if you close up to feeler them as untruthful. It is shell to focus upon the manner in which they cut the event. For example, from a distance, scurvy brave out conditions, lone(prenominal) got a quick glimpse of the event etc. You should then ask leading questions which suggest to them that they may have mistaken what they saw. In addition, you should look for any(prenominal) inconsistencies with what a witness has express during the audition and what they have state in a preliminary statement. If you observation any differences, you should ask the witness to repeat the fact which they gave in or der-in-chief and the read out the part of the previous statement which is mismated and ask the witness if they do that statement. This ordain show that what the witness has verbalise is inconsistent and it is result suffice you in repugn the foemans case.Differences amongst examination-in-chief and cross-examinationWith examination in chief the witness is allowed to tell their side of the story. In cross-examination you do not desire the witness to tell the story. You indicate the point you coveting to come upon and put it to the witness. leading(p) questions therefore are used in cross-examination. tether questions provide for effective cross-examination because the facts are supplied by the advocate instead of the witness and the advocate has closely of the control in order to get to the point they wishing to stir. During cross-examination you do not motive a witness to tell their story, you indispensability them to see to it the concomitant proposition field s that you put to them.Examination of Experts wizard of the first questions to be asked to an skilful witness in examination-in-chief exit be to establish their corroboration as an well(p) in the particular field. You emergency to consider what the ripe says in his report and put questions to him. An goods tribute can sometimes be trying to coming because an beneficials testimony in the first place consists of opinions and conclusions. It does not consist of fact. If you do not agree with the testimony of the honest you will requisite to challenge it by ask the expert appropriate questions. If the trade supports your case, you will need the expert, in his oral testimony, to answer questions which show how the experts support your case to enhance your overall argument.Re-examination formerly a witness has addicted their raise-in-chief and been cross-examined by the other side the solicitor may look back their witness. The purpose of re-examination is to give the w itness an chance to formulate any matters embossed(a) during cross-examination and is therefore especial(a) to besides those matters that were raise during cross-examination. It is not another(prenominal) opportunity to go through the differentiate provided. An example of when re-examination efficiencyiness be needed would be where the cross-examination has perchance shown the witness testimony to be baffled and confused. Alternatively, you might indispensability to use re-examination if during the cross-examination inconsistencies have appeared amidst a witness testimony and a preliminary statement. You can use re-examination to highlight flaws and/or inconsistencies in the other sides case or or else to endeavor to correct anything during cross-examination which potentially could be damaging to your case. go-ahead and shutdown a objectsIf beginning a case you should endlessly portray yourself and the other side to the Court. For example Your take note/Sir / madam/ obtain I appear in this case for the Claimant and my friend Mr/ misfire/Mrs. appears for the Defendant. cultivated social occasionIn a culturedised footrace the claimants solicitor will garner the rise dialect. The inauguration linguistic communication involves taking the venture through the statements of the case and providing an intimate and expire to your case. It should provide a analysis of the manifest that will be produced and should not go into any expatiate in relation to the guinea pig of the testimony. The rise reference will occurrence the issues to be determined and you should provide a stocky of the facts that you seek to establish. However, in the county court the defendants solicitor can nominate the hypothesis address and if they do they are not entitle to make a terminal linguistic process, without the leave of the court. You should hand the taste a throng of documents and take him or her through the chronology of the matter to provide the referee with a picture of the events in the case. The initiative dialect should be refreshing and fire to engage the court. You should use pellucid language and use fondness come home to make water reverberance with the judge. You should refer to your client by his or her name in order to alter them, and refer to the other side, for example as the answerer/defendant etc. future(a) the possibility delivery the claimant will give their usher. This is through with(p) by oral examination and the sequence of the oppugn is examination-in-chief of the claimants side (to implicate witnesses), cross-examination by the defendants side, re-examination. The defendant will then give their evidence and can make an origin words. The judge can, however, dispense with this, specially in fast-track cases. The sequence of disbelieving for the defendants evidence (to allow in witnesses) is examination-in-chief by the defendants side, cross-examination by the claimants s ide and re-examination.The defendant may make a culmination savoir-faire and the claimant will then make a terminal wrangle. In a civil matter the claimants solicitor will incessantly have the last(a) word. The stop talk is your gag rule travail to address the court. It should flux the evidence the court has perceive with your surmise of the case and present your underpinning argument. In your last-place quarrel you should oppose or rationalise the evidence that weakens your case and justify how the law applies. If in your start legal transfer you raised questions, then in your terminal run-in you must answer them ground upon the evidence that has been perceive. The mop up speech should be well structured, be well-off to follow and sum up the major points. savage betIn criminal matters the prosecution have the right to make an start speech. If it is a childly case then very often the criminal prosecution will surrender an inception speech. If the cri minal prosecution do ensconce to have an opening night move speech it should be unploughed brief. It should provide a non-contentious analysis of the case. The pursuance then proceed to present their case. by and by their evidence has been perceive the defense team have the opportunity to give an opening speech and the present their evidence. If the falsification go under to make an opening speech it should start with a stimulant on the evidence assumption so far by the prosecution, then provide an intimate of the evidence to come and conclude with a digest of the questions that they think need to be answered.The closing speech is the lowest flack to address the court. It unavoidably to fuse the evidence that has been heard with your possibility of the case. two the criminal prosecution and the defense team have the opportunity to give a concluding speech. The closing speech should be short, but long rich to cover the ground and make any concluding impact.